References

[1] Le Guin, U.K. 1989. The Carrier Bag Theory of Fiction. Dancing at the Edge of the World: Thoughts on Words, Women, Places. Grove Press. 165–170.

[2] Fisher, E. 1979. Woman’s creation: sexual evolution and the shaping of society. Anchor Press/Doubleday.

[3] Lawrence, M. et al. 2024. Global polycrisis: the causal mechanisms of crisis entanglement. Global Sustainability. 7, (Jan. 2024), e6. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2024.1.

[4] Purgathofer, P. 2006. Is informatics a design discipline? Poiesis & Praxis. 4, 4 (Dec. 2006), 303–314. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10202-006-0029-0.

[5] van Wynsberghe, A. 2021. Sustainable AI: AI for sustainability and the sustainability of AI. AI and Ethics. 1, 3 (Aug. 2021), 213–218. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00043-6.

[6] Mattern, S. 2018. Maintenance and Care. Places Journal. (Nov. 2018). DOI:https://doi.org/10.22269/181120.

[7] De La Bellacasa, M.P. 2017. Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More than Human Worlds. University of Minnesota Press.

[8] Gabrys, J. 2013. Digital Rubbish: A Natural History of Electronics. University of Michigan Press.

[9] Benjamin, R. 2023. Race After Technology. Social Theory Re-Wired. W. Longhofer and D. Winchester, eds. Routledge.

[10] Eubanks, V. 2018. Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. St. Martin’s Publishing Group.

[11] Hellige, H.D. 2004. Sichtweisen der Informatikgeschichte: Eine Einführung. Geschichten der Informatik: Visionen, Paradigmen, Leitmotive. H.D. Hellige, ed. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 1–28.

[12] Shelley, M. 1818. Frankenstein or The Modern Prometheus.

[13] Sagan, D. 2012. Lynn Margulis: The Life and Legacy of a Scientific Rebel. Chelsea Green Publishing.

[14] Capoccia, G. and Kelemen, R.D. 2007. The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism. World Politics. 59, 3 (2007), 341–369.

[15] Collier, D. and Munck, G.L. 2017. Building Blocks and Methodological Challenges: A Framework for Studying Critical Junctures. (Sep. 2017).

[16] Uhlmann, M. et al. 2024. The Platformization of Media Structures as a Critical Juncture: A Pragmatist Perspective on Value Mediation by Journalistic Start-ups and Established Publishers. medien & zeit. Kommunikation in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart. 39, 2 (Dec. 2024), 36–47.

[17] Vardi, M.Y. 2024. Is Computing a Discipline in Crisis? Commun. ACM. 67, 7 (Jul. 2024), 5. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3665660.

[18] Geels, F.W. 2002. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy. 31, 8 (Dec. 2002), 1257–1274. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8.

[19] Siapera, E. et al. 2015. Post-Crisis Journalism: Critique and renewal in Greek journalism. Journalism Studies. 16, 3 (May 2015), 449–465. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2014.916479.

[20] Campbell, J. 2008. The hero with a thousand faces. New World Library.

[21] Voytilla, S. 1999. Myth and the movies: discovering the mythic structure of over 50 unforgettable films. Michael Wiese Productions.

[22] Hambly, G. 2021. The not so universal hero’s journey. Journal of Screenwriting. 12, 2 (Jun. 2021), 135–150. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1386/josc_00056_1.

[23] Yaszek, L. 2023. Introduction. The Routledge Companion to Gender and Science Fiction. Routledge. 3–10.

[24] Mark Zuckerberg’s ‘Masculine Energy’ Is Tech’s Power Play Laid Bare: 2025. https://www.forbes.com/sites/gemmaallen/2025/01/19/mark-zuckerbergs-masculine-energy-is-techs-power-play-laid-bare/. Accessed: 2025-02-12.

[25] The Californian Ideology: 1995. https://www.metamute.org/editorial/articles/californian-ideology. Accessed: 2025-02-12.

[26] Coy, W. 2004. Was ist Informatik? Zur Entstehung des Faches an den deutschen Universitäten. Geschichten der Informatik: Visionen, Paradigmen, Leitmotive. H.D. Hellige, ed. Springer. 473–498.

[27] Rolf, A. 1992. Informatik als Gestaltungswissenschaft — Bausteine für einen Sichtwechsel. Informatik cui bono? (Berlin, Heidelberg, 1992), 40–48.

[28] Hellige, H.D. 2014. Die Informatisierung der Lebenswelt : Der Strategiewandel algorithmischer Alltagsbewältigung. Vielfalt der Informatik: ein Beitrag zu Selbstverständnis und Außenwirkung. A. Zeising et al., eds. Universität Bremen. 27–61.

[29] Gao, Z. 2014. Methodologism/Methodological Imperative. Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology. T. Teo, ed. Springer New York. 1176–1179.

[30] Hopple, G.W. 1986. Decision Aiding Dangers: The Law of the Hammer and Other Maxims. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. 16, 6 (1986), 948–964. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1986.4309013.

[31] Moore, J.A. and Keene, A.S. 1983. Archaeology and the Law of the Hammer. Archaeological Hammers and Theories. Elsevier. 3–13.

[32] Biundo, S. et al. 2006. Positionspapier: Was ist Informatik? (2006).

[33] When AI summaries replace hyperlinks, thought itself is flattened | Aeon Essays: 2024. https://aeon.co/essays/when-ai-summaries-replace-hyperlinks-thought-itself-is-flattened. Accessed: 2025-02-12.

[34] Haraway, D. 1988. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies. 14, 3 (1988), 575–599. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066.

[35] Faulkner, W. 2001. The technology question in feminism. Women’s Studies International Forum. 24, 1 (Jan. 2001), 79–95. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(00)00166-7.

[36] Chun, W.H.K. 2011. Programmed Visions: Software and Memory. MIT Press.

[37] Galvan, J.N. 2010. Sympathetic medium: feminine channeling, the occult, and communication technologies, 1859-1919. Cornell university press.

[38] Natale, S. 2021. Deceitful media: artificial intelligence and social life after the turing test. Oxford University Press.

[39] Rankin, Y.A. and Thomas, J.O. 2020. The Intersectional Experiences of Black Women in Computing. Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (New York, NY, USA, Feb. 2020), 199–205.

[40] The True Story of “Hidden Figures,” the Forgotten Women Who Helped Win the Space Race: 2026. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/forgotten-black-women-mathematicians-who-helped-win-wars-and-send-astronauts-space-180960393/. Accessed: 2025-02-12.

[41] Rosner, D.K. 2018. Critical Fabulations: Reworking the Methods and Margins of Design. The MIT Press.

[42] Kumar, N. and Karusala, N. 2019. Intersectional computing. interactions. 26, 2 (Feb. 2019), 50–54. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3305360.

[43] Gioia, D.A. and Pitre, E. 1990. Multiparadigm Perspectives on Theory Building. The Academy of Management Review. 15, 4 (Oct. 1990), 584. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/258683.

[44] Rogers, Y. 2004. New theoretical approaches for HCI. Annual review of information science and technology. 38, 1 (2004), 87–143.

[45] Beaudouin-Lafon, M. et al. 2021. Generative Theories of Interaction. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. 28, 6 (Dec. 2021), 1–54. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3468505.

[46] Dourish, P. 2006. Implications for design. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montréal Québec Canada, Apr. 2006), 541–550.

[47] Dalsgaard, P. and Dindler, C. 2014. Between theory and practice: bridging concepts in HCI research. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto Ontario Canada, Apr. 2014), 1635–1644.ƒ

[48] Oulasvirta, A. and Hornbæk, K. 2022. Counterfactual Thinking: What Theories Do in Design. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. 38, 1 (Jan. 2022), 78–92. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1925436.

[49] Hornbæk, K. 2024. The Theory Crisis in Human-Computer Interaction. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/khornbaek_keynoteslides-activity-7236319998992908288-q-hG/?rcm=ACoAAELh28IBrDz666oON9COJefURa8ApkFQU7A. Accessed: 2025-02-17.

[50] Gaver, W. 2014. Science and Design: The Implications of Different Forms of Accountability. Ways of Knowing in HCI. J.S. Olson and W.A. Kellogg, eds. Springer New York. 143–165.

[51] Frauenberger, C. 2019. Entanglement HCI The Next Wave? ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 27, 1 (Nov. 2019), 2:1-2:27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3364998.

[52] Bogh Anderson, P. 1986. Semiotics and informatics: computers as media. Information Technology and Information Use: Towards a Unified View of Information and Information Technology. P. Ingwersen et al., eds. Taylor Graham Publishing.

[53] Nadin, M. 2007. Semiotic Machine. Public Journal of Semiotics. 1, 1 (Jan. 2007), 57–75. DOI:https://doi.org/10.37693/pjos.2007.1.8815.

[54] Manovich, L. 2002. The Language of New Media. MIT Press.

[55] Nake, F. 2016. The Disappearing Masterpiece: Digital Image & Algorithmic Revolution. xCoAx: Proceedings of the Conference on Computation, Communication, Aesthetics and X (Bergamo, Italy, 2016), 12–27.

[56] Nake, F. 2001. Das algorithmische Zeichen. GI-Jahrestagung. (Jan. 2001).

[57] Nake, F. ed. 1993. Die erträgliche Leichtigkeit der Zeichen: Ästhetik, Semiotik, Informatik;. Baden-Baden.

[58] Schelhowe, H. 1996. Software-Entwicklung als sozialer Gestaltungsprozeß – Aspekte für eine Frauenforschung in der Informatik. (1996), 54–58.

[59] Nake, F. 1992. Informatik und die Maschinisierung von Kopfarbeit. Sichtweisen der Informatik. W. Coy et al., eds. Vieweg+Teubner Verlag.

[60] Harding, S. 1991. Feministische Wissenschaftstheorie: Zum Verhältnis von Wissenschaft und sozialem Geschlecht. Argument.

[61] Berry, D.M. 2011. The Philosophy of Software. Palgrave Macmillan UK.

[62] Zuse, K. 1939. Der Computer - Mein Lebenswerk. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[63] Hayles, N.K. 1993. The Materiality of Informatics. Configurations. 1, 1 (Dec. 1993), 147–170. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/con.1993.0003.

[64] Robben, B. and Schelhowe, H. eds. 2012. Be-greifbare Interaktionen: Der allgegenwärtige Computer: Touchscreens, Wearables, Tangibles und Ubiquitous Computing. transcript Verlag.

[65] Pfeifer, R. et al. 2007. On the Information Theoretic Implications of Embodiment – Principles and Methods. 50 Years of Artificial Intelligence. M. Lungarella et al., eds. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 76–86.

[66] Draude, C. et al. 2019. Situated algorithms: a sociotechnical systemic approach to bias. Online Information Review. 44, 2 (Nov. 2019), 325–342. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-10-2018-0332.

[67] Klumbytė, G. and Britton, L. 2020. Abstracting Otherwise: In Search for a Common Strategy of Arts and Computing. ASAP/Journal. 5, 1 (2020), 19–43. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/asa.2020.0001.

[68] D’Ignazio, C. and Klein, L.F. 2020. Data Feminism. MIT Press.

[69] Landin, H. 2005. Fragile and magical: materiality of computational technology as design material. Proceedings of the 4th decennial conference on Critical computing: between sense and sensibility (Aarhus Denmark, Aug. 2005), 117–120.

[70] Lee-Smith, M.L. et al. 2023. Data as a Material for Design: Alternative Narratives, Divergent Pathways, and Future Directions. Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg Germany, Apr. 2023), 1–5.

[71] Holmquist, L.E. 2017. Intelligence on tap: artificial intelligence as a new design material. interactions. 24, 4 (Jun. 2017), 28–33. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3085571.

[72] Deleuze, G. et al. 2007. A thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia. Univ. of Minnesota Press.

[73] Hill Collins, P. 2002. Black Feminist Thought. Routledge.

[74] Braidotti, R. 2019. Posthuman knowledge. Polity.

[75] Denning, P.J. and Tedre, M. 2019. Computational thinking. The MIT Press.

[76] Wing, J.M. 2006. Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM. 49, 3 (Mar. 2006), 33–35. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215.

[77] Klumbytė, G. and Draude, C. 2025. New Materialist Informatics: New Materialism/Computer Science/Technology Design. Posthuman Convergences: Transdisciplinary Methods and Practices. G. Klumbytė et al., eds. Edinburgh University Press.

[78] Agre, P.E. 1997. Toward a Critical Technical Practice: Lessons Learned in Trying to Reform AI. Social Science, Technical Systems, and Cooperative Work: Beyond the Great Divide. G.C. Bowker et al., eds. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 131–157.

[79] Lury, C. and Wakeford, N. eds. 2012. Inventive Methods. Routledge.

[80] Lorde, A. 1983. The Master’s Tools Will Never Dismantle the Master’s House. This Bridge Called My Back: Writings By Radical Women of Color. C. Moraga and G.E. Anzaldúa, eds. Kitchen Table: Women Of Color Press. 98–101.

[81] Huhtamo, E. and Parikka, J. 2011. Media Archaeology: Approaches, Applications, and Implications. University of California Press.

[82] Natale, S. 2012. Understanding Media Archaeology. Canadian Journal of Communication. 37, 3 (Oct. 2012), 523–528. DOI:https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2012v37n3a2577.

[83] Corley, K.G. and Gioia, D.A. 2011. Building Theory about Theory Building: What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution? Academy of Management Review. 36, 1 (Jan. 2011), 12–32. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486.

[84] Jemielniak, D. and Raburski, T. 2014. Liquid Collaboration 1. Liquid organization: Zygmunt Bauman and organization theory. J. Kociatkiewicz and M. Kostera, eds. Routledge,Taylor & Francis Group.

[85] Bauman, Z. 2000. Liquid modernity. Polity Press ; Blackwell.

[86] Ardati, A.A. et al. 2024. Designing for Care in the Wikipedia Community. Participatory Design Conference 2024 (Sibu Malaysia, Aug. 2024), 75–85.

[87] Helfrich, S. and Bollier, D. 2019. Free, fair, and alive: the insurgent power of the commons. New Society Publishers.

[88] Tronto, J.C. 1998. An Ethic of Care. Generations: Journal of the American Society on Aging. 22, 3 (1998), 15–20.

[89] Tronto, J.C. and Fischer, B. 1990. Toward a Feminist Theory of Caring. Circles of Care. E. Abel and M. Nelson, eds. SUNY Press. 36–54.

[90] Draude, C. 2023. Working with Diversity in Informatics. Hochschuldidaktik der Informatik HDI 2021: 9. Fachtagung des GI-Fachbereichs Informatik und Ausbildung/Didaktik der Informatik ; 15.-16. September 2021 in Dortmund. J. Desel et al., eds. Universitätsverlag. 13–33.

[91] Wüller, H. 2023. Pflege und Technik: Empirische Einblicke in Care-Arbeit aus der Perspektive des Agentiellen Realismus. transcript Verlag.

[92] Gray, J. and Witt, A. 2021. Feminist data ethics of care for machine learning: The what, why, who and how. First Monday. (Dec. 2021). DOI:https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v26i12.11833.

[93] Hardin, G. 1968. The Tragedy of the Commons: The population problem has no technical solution; it requires a fundamental extension in morality. Science. 162, 3859 (Dec. 1968), 1243–1248. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243.

[94] de Groot, T. and Bloemen, S. 2019. Our Commons: Political Ideas for a New Europe. Institute of Network Cultures.

[95] Bollier, D. 2014. Think like a commoner: a short introduction to the life of the commons. New Society Publishers.

[96] Bresnihan, P. 2020. The more-than-human commons: From commons to commoning. Space, power and the commons: the struggle for alternative futures. S. Kirwan et al., eds. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

[97] Sicart, M. 2020. Playing software: the role of the ludic in the software society. Information, Communication & Society. 23, 14 (Dec. 2020), 2081–2095. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1764078.

[98] Sicart, M. 2023. Playing software: homo ludens in computational culture. The MIT Press.

[99] Haraway, D.J. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.

[100] 2016. Donna Haraway: Story Telling for Earthly Survival. Atelier Graphoui, CBA, Centre du Cinéma et de l’Audiovisuel de la Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles.

[101] Nash, J.C. 2018. Black Feminism Reimagined: After Intersectionality. Duke University Press.

[102] Benjamin, R. 2025. Imagination: a manifesto. W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.

[103] Abdilla, A. et al. 2020. Indigenous Protocol and Artificial Intelligence Position Paper. Concordia University Library.

[104] Lewis, J.E. et al. 2018. Making Kin with the Machines. Journal of Design and Science. (Jul. 2018). DOI:https://doi.org/10.21428/bfafd97b.

[105] Pasquinelli, M. 2019. Three Thousand Years of Algorithmic Rituals: The Emergence of AI from the Computation of Space. e-flux Journal. #101 (2019).

[106] Eglash, R. 2023. Ethno-biomathematics: A Decolonial Approach to Mathematics at the Intersection of Human and Nonhuman Design. Ubiratan D’Ambrosio and Mathematics Education. M.C. Borba and D.C. Orey, eds. Springer International Publishing. 289–303.

[107] Sun, Y. and Geoghegan, B.D. Carried Away: The Carrier Bag Theory of Media. Technics. Amsterdam University Press.

[108] Vu, C. 2018. New materialist auto-ethico-ethnography: agential-realist authenticity and objectivity in intimate scholarship. Decentering the researcher in intimate scholarship: critical posthuman methodological perspectives in education. K.J. Strom et al., eds. Emerald Publishing.

[109] Chapman, R. 2023. Empire of Normality: Neurodiversity and Capitalism. Pluto Press.

[110] Masakhane: https://www.masakhane.io/. Accessed: 2025-02-14.

[111] FIfF e.V.: https://blog.fiff.de/. Accessed: 2025-02-13.

[112] 2023. Dzata: The Institute of Technological Consciousness (2023).

[113] INDIGENOUS AI: https://www.indigenous-ai.net/. Accessed: 2025-02-17.

[114] Full Stack Feminism: https://fullstackfeminismdh.pubpub.org/. Accessed: 2025-02-17.

[115] Spektor, F. and Fox, S. 2020. The ‘Working Body’: Interrogating and Reimagining the Productivist Impulses of Transhumanism through Crip-Centered Speculative Design. Somatechnics. 10, 3 (Dec. 2020), 327–354. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3366/soma.2020.0326.

[116] Wong, R.Y. et al. 2020. Infrastructural Speculations: Tactics for Designing and Interrogating Lifeworlds. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu HI USA, Apr. 2020), 1–15.

[117] Smith, N. 2023. Data Quilts: Exploring Environmental Data Through Textile Art – Data Science by Design.

[118] 2017. Computational Textiles and Architecture : Felecia Davis. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F7wSbWwVvVY.

[119] Kesewaa Dankwa, N. 2021. “All Names are Pseudonyms”: A Critical Reflection on Pseudonymizing Names in HCI: “All Names are Pseudonyms.” Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama Japan, May 2021), 1–6.

[120] Hamraie, A. and Fritsch, K. 2019. Crip Technoscience Manifesto. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience. 5, 1 (Apr. 2019), 1–33. DOI:https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v5i1.29607.

[121] Gardner, P. and Rauchberg, J. 2024. Feminist cybernetic, critical race, postcolonial, and crip propositions for the theoretical future of Human-Machine Communication. Human-Machine Communication. 8, (2024), 27–51. DOI:https://doi.org/10.30658/hmc.8.2.

[122] Spiel, K. 2022. Transreal tracing: Queer-feminist speculations on disabled technologies. Feminist Theory. 23, 2 (Apr. 2022), 247–265. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/14647001221082299.

[123] Dixon-Román, E. 2017. Toward a hauntology on data: On the sociopolitical forces of data assemblages. Research in Education. 98, 1 (Aug. 2017), 44–58. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0034523717723387.

[124] Couldry, N. and Mejias, U.A. 2019. Data Colonialism: Rethinking Big Data’s Relation to the Contemporary Subject. Television & New Media. 20, 4 (May 2019), 336–349. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418796632.

[125] V2_ Lab for the Unstable Media: https://v2.nl/. Accessed: 2025-02-17.

[126] Guhl, A.F. 2020. Kurskorrekturen eines Technokraten. Die politische Rechtswendung des Nachrichtentechnikers und Zukunftsforschers Karl Steinbuch nach 1970 — Course Corrections of a Technocrat. The Rightist Turn of the Information Technologist and Futurologist Karl Steinbuch after 1970. Technikgeschichte. 87, 4 (2020), 315–334. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5771/0040-117X-2020-4-315.

[127] Balzert, H. 2005. Lehrbuch Grundlagen der Informatik: Konzepte und Notationen in UML 2, Java 5, C und C#, Algorithmik und Software-Technik, Anwendungen ; mit CD-ROM und e-learning-Online-Kurs. Elsevier, Spektrum Akad. Verl.

[128] Tedre, M. 2015. The science of computing: shaping a discipline. CRC Press.

[129] Mitcham, C. 1994. Thinking through technology: the path between engineering and philosophy. University of Chicago Press.

[130] Koen, B.V. 2003. Discussion of the method: conducting the engineer’s approach to problem solving. Oxford University Press.

[131] Ensmenger, N. 2010. The computer boys take over: computers, programmers, and the politics of technical expertise. MIT Press.

[132] Fein, L. 1959. The role of the University in computers, data processing, and related fields. Communications of the ACM. 2, 9 (Sep. 1959), 7–14. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/368424.368427.

[133] Atchison, W.F. et al. 1968. Curriculum 68: Recommendations for academic programs in computer science: a report of the ACM curriculum committee on computer science. Communications of the ACM. 11, 3 (Mar. 1968), 151–197. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/362929.362976.

[134] Forsythe, G. 1968. Computer science and education. Proc. IFIP 68 Cong (1968), 92–106.

[135] Richard W. Hamming - A.M. Turing Award Laureate: https://amturing.acm.org/award_winners/hamming_1000652.cfm. Accessed: 2025-02-17.

[136] Austing, R.H. et al. 1979. Curriculum ’78: recommendations for the undergraduate program in computer science— a report of the ACM curriculum committee on computer science. Communications of the ACM. 22, 3 (Mar. 1979), 147–166. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/359080.359083.

[137] Wishner, R.P. 1968. Letters to the editor: comment on curriculum 68. Communications of the ACM. 11, 10 (Oct. 1968), 658. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/364096.364106.

[138] Ralston, A. and Shaw, M. 1985. Curriculum ’78—Is Computer Science Really that Unmathematical? The Carnegie-Mellon Curriculum for Undergraduate Computer Science. M. Shaw, ed. Springer New York. 45–51.

[139] Denning, P.J. et al. 1988. Report of the ACM Task Force on The Core of Computer Science. Association for Computing Machinery.

[140] Association for Computing Machinery 1991. Computing Curricula 1991: Report of the ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Curriculum Task Force. Association for Computing Machinery.

[141] Schelhowe, H. 2012. Interaktionsdesign für reflexive Erfahrung: Digitale Medien für Bildung. Kultur- und Medientheorie. B. Robben and H. Schelhowe, eds. transcript Verlag. 253–272.

[142] Wing, J.M. 2008. Five deep questions in computing. Communications of the ACM. 51, 1 (Jan. 2008), 58–60. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1327452.1327479.

[143] Maass, S. and Wiesner, H. 2006. Programmieren, Mathe und ein bisschen Hardware ... Wen lockt dies Bild der Informatik? (2006), 125–132.

[144] Håpnes, T. and Rasmussen, B. 1991. The production of male power in computer science. Proceedings of the IFIP-Conference on Women, Work and Computerization (Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1991), 407–423.

[145] Burstall, R.M. 1992. Computing: Yet Another Reality Construction. Software Development and Reality Construction. C. Floyd et al., eds. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 45–51.

[146] Wegner, P. 1970. Three Computer Cultures: Computer Technology, Computer Mathematics, and Computer Science. Advances in Computers. Elsevier. 7–78.

[147] Fein, L. 1984. Oral history interview with Louis Fein. University Digital Conservancy. (May 1984).

[148] Über uns - Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V.: https://gi.de/ueber-uns. Accessed: 2025-02-13.

[149] Grand Challenges 2025: Vor diesen Herausforderungen steht die Informatik: 2025. https://gi.de/meldung/grand-challenges-2025. Accessed: 2025-02-13.

[150] Mission & Vision: https://www.ieee.org/about/vision-mission.html. Accessed: 2025-02-13.

[151] Goldweber, M. et al. 1997. Historical perspectives on the computing curriculum (report of the ITiCSE ’97 working group on historical perspectives in computing education). The supplemental proceedings of the conference on Integrating technology into computer science education: working group reports and supplemental proceedings (Uppsala Sweden, Jun. 1997), 94–111.

[152] About CSTA: https://csteachers.org/about-csta/. Accessed: 2025-02-13.

[153] Mission & History | MIT CSAIL: https://www.csail.mit.edu/about/mission-history. Accessed: 2025-02-13.

[154] Informatik (Master/Hauptfach) 4501: https://www.lmu.de/de/studium/studienangebot/alle-studienfaecher-und-studiengaenge/informatik-master-hauptfach-4501.html. Accessed: 2025-02-13.

[155] Bachelor Informatik - TUM: 2025. https://www.cit.tum.de/cit/studium/studiengaenge/bachelor-informatik/. Accessed: 2025-02-13.

[156] Bachelor’s Programs | Carnegie Mellon University Computer Science Department: https://csd.cmu.edu/academics/bachelors/overview. Accessed: 2025-02-13.

[157] Computer Science: https://www.harvard.edu/programs/computer-science/. Accessed: 2025-02-13.

[158] Computer Science - NUS Computing: https://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/programmes/ug/cs/. Accessed: 2025-02-13.

[159] Computer Science Department: 2019. https://www.ime.usp.br/en/computer-science-department/. Accessed: 2025-02-13.

[160] Our degrees | University of Cape Town: https://sit.uct.ac.za/our-degrees. Accessed: 2025-02-13.

[161] Informatics | TU Wien: https://www.tuwien.at/en/studies/studies/bachelor-programmes/computer-science-and-business-informatics/informatics. Accessed: 2025-02-13.

[162] Informatics Engineering: https://www.pucp.edu.pe/en/carrera/ingenieria-informatica/. Accessed: 2025-02-13.

[163] Elgueta, A. 2025. Coding prodigy swapping GCSEs for Silicon Valley. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2ykx5qv9xo. Accessed: 2025-02-17.

[164] Ng, K. 2025. “DeepSeek brought me to tears”: How young Chinese find therapy in AI. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy7g45g2nxno. Accessed: 2025-02-17.

[165] Rahman-Jones, I. 2025. Ex-Google boss Eric Schmidt fears for “Bin Laden” AI scenario. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5y6eq2zxlno. Accessed: 2025-02-17.

[166] BBC 2025. University of Surrey develops AI tool to tackle knife crime. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c30d59lmd1mo. Accessed: 2025-02-17.

[167] Der Standard 2025. Helsing und Mistral entwickeln KI-Drohnen made in Europe. DER STANDARD. https://www.derstandard.at/story/3000000256917/helsing-und-mistral-entwickeln-ki-drohnen-made-in-europe. Accessed: 2025-02-17.

[168] Thomas, J.O. et al. 2018. Speaking Truth to Power: Exploring the Intersectional Experiences of Black Women in Computing. (Baltimore, MD, USA, 2018).

[169] Spike Jonze. HER. 2013. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1798709/.

[170] Alex Garland. Ex Machina. 2014. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0470752/.

[171] Weizenbaum, J. 2023. Die Macht der Computer und die Ohnmacht der Vernunft. Suhrkamp.

[172] Weizenbaum, J. and Klug, F. 2005. Computermacht und Gesellschaft: freie Reden. Suhrkamp.

[173] Draude, C. and Klumbytė, G. 2022. Hybrid Spaces, Hybrid Methodologies: Finding Ways of Working with Social Sciences and Humanities in Human-Computer Interaction. Human-Computer Interaction. Theoretical Approaches and Design Methods. M. Kurosu, ed. Springer International Publishing. 40–56.

[174] O’Donovan, N. 2021. Personal Data and Collective Value: Data-Driven Personalisation as Network Effect. Data-driven personalisation in markets, politics and law. U. Kohl and J. Eisler, eds. Cambridge University Press. 74–94.

[175] Nissenbaum, H. 2004. Privacy as Contextual Integrity. Washington Law Review. 79, 1 (Jan. 2004), 119–157.

[176] BBC Radio 4. Synthetic. 2023. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m001r7n0

[177] Karwatzki, S. et al. 2017. Beyond the Personalization–Privacy Paradox: Privacy Valuation, Transparency Features, and Service Personalization. Journal of Management Information Systems. 34, 2 (Apr. 2017), 369–400. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2017.1334467.

[178] Association for Computing Machinery 1991. Computing Curricula 1991: Report of the ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Curriculum Task Force. Association for Computing Machinery.

[179] Rhodes, J. and Alexander, J. 2015. Techne: Queer Meditations on Writing the Self. Computers and Composition Digital Press/Utah State University Press.